Netflix, which offers consumers DVDs mailed to their home or instantly streamed through a wide number of devices, offers subscribers so much variety that sometimes choosing what to watch can be a hard choice. But the company announced yesterday a new choice that will be particularly difficult and one to which consumers should pay attention.
The company has been offering a flat-fee plan to consumers that includes DVDs mailed to the house plus access to its instant streaming catalogue. The new plan, however, splits those offerings into two separate plans, and does not offer a discount for both plans.
For example, a current plan that includes Blu-ray disc access and unlimited streaming is currently $11.99 a month (including an additional charge for Blu-ray discs). That plan would become two plans, starting on or after Sept. 1: A $7.99 per month streaming plan, and a $9.99 a month DVD-by-mail plan. That would be $17.98 per month, a 50 percent increase from the current membership.
So, consumers face something of a choice. They can pay a steep increase in their monthly fee – in the above example an additional $72 a year – or they can reduce services. That reduction, however, is a difficult one for consumers. While instant streaming offers incredible convenience through a number of platforms, the library offers significantly less depth than the hard-copy DVD library. The DVD-by-mail option, however, does not allow the same freedom as the instant streaming option. Already, consumers are voicing displeasure at having to make a choice.
Netflix is the dominant entity in the market, but others – like Hulu and Amazon – have been mounting challenges. How they react to the news – and whether they can pull market share away from Netflix as consumers review their options – will be interesting to see in the long run.
In the short-term, consumers should review their Netflix and decide how to proceed. The company’s emailed note to subscribers make clear that by doing nothing, the subscriber will be put into the dual plan with both services – essentially agreeing to a steep price increase. Consumers should decide how they want their plan to be managed going forward, and they should keep an eye out on the competition and see if they find an offering that they feel is better suited to their needs.
How to Combat Illegal Robocalls posted on Jul 25
Robocalls have become an all-too-common nuisance for consumers. Robocalls are unsolicited, pre-recorded phone calls, often scams, which are made to consumers without their permission, as opposed to calls solicited by the consumer, such as those from pharmacies and childrens’ schools. Robocalls are illegal in Massachusetts under M.G.L. c. 159C. While consumers can, and should, sign-up -for both the state and national Do-Not-Call lists, unfortunately this does not always stop many unscrupulous solicitors and scammers from making these calls.
Summary of the 2015 Consumer Federation of America Annual Consumer Complaint Survey posted on Jul 22
The Consumer Federation of America and the North American Consumer Protection Investigators recently released the results of the 2015 Consumer Complaint Survey. This report is based on consumer information, complaints, and suggestions for increased consumer protections from 33 consumer agencies in 21 states.
Do-Not-Call Consumer & Solicitor Responsibilities posted on Jul 20
The Massachusetts Do-Not-Call Registry allows consumers to stop receiving certain telephone solicitations simply by signing-up and providing their telephone number. Established in 2003, the law requires telephone solicitors, list-brokers, and telemarketers to register with the Office of Consumer Affairs and Business Regulation, subscribe to the Do-Not-Call Registry, and remove registered telephone numbers of consumers from their call lists.