Post Content

“While the President’s ability to use executive orders as a means of implementing presidential power has been established as a matter of law and practice, it is equally well established that the substance of an executive order, including any requirements or prohibitions, may have the force and effect of law only if the presidential action is based on power vested in the President by the U.S. Constitution or delegated to the President by Congress.” This quotation is from the Congressional Research Service’s 2014 report entitled ”Executive Orders: Issuance, Modification and Revocation.” The report discusses the nature of executive orders “with a focus on the scope of presidential authority to execute such instruments, as well as judicial and congressional responses to their issuance.”

In 1952, President Harry S. Truman issued an executive order that was later determined to be unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court. “The Supreme Court in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer established the framework for analyzing whether the President’s issuance of an executive order is a valid presidential action.”

President William Jefferson Clinton was thought to have made expansive use of presidential Executive Orders. A number of articles written during Clinton’s second term in office shine a light on the practice of issuing Executive Orders:

William J. Olson and Alan Woll, Policy Analysis, “Executive Orders and National Emergencies: How Presidents Have Come to ‘Run the Country’ by Usurping Legislative Power”, Cato Institute (October 28, 1999).

Tara L. Branum, 28 Journal of Legislation 1 (2002), “President or King – The Use and Abuse of Executive Orders in Modern-Day America.”

John A. Sterling, 31 U. West.L.A. L. Rev. 99 (2000), “Above the Law: Evolution of Executive Orders”.

An earlier blog post on Massachusetts Law Updates will help you with “Finding Presidential Executive Orders.”

A blog post to follow will use President Trump’s January 27, 2017 Executive Order 13769, “Protecting the Nation From Foreign Terrorist Entry Into the United States” as an example of how to consider the status of an order that was issued, modified and revoked.

Written By:

Recent Posts

Word(s) of the Month – in pari delicto posted on Jun 1

Word(s) of the Month - in pari delicto

Words of Law is a regular feature of Massachusetts Law Updates, highlighting a particular word or phrase and its meaning in law. Today’s phrase is  in pari delicto. in pari delicto (in par-I dә-lik-toh), adv. [Latin “in equal fault’] Equally at fault <the court denied   …Continue Reading Word(s) of the Month – in pari delicto

Hate Speech Law in Massachusetts posted on May 23

Hate crime and hate speech are related, but not identical topics.  A hate crime is a crime that is motivated by bigotry.   See our earlier blog post about hate crime in Massachusetts. Hate speech is defined by Black’s Law Dictionary (10th ed., 2014) as: “Speech   …Continue Reading Hate Speech Law in Massachusetts

Hate Crime Law in Massachusetts posted on Apr 20

“Hate crimes” and “hate speech” are hot topics in the realms of education, the courts, the media, and in our daily lives.  These are two separate but related issues.  “Hate speech” will be a subsequent post. According to Black’s Law Dictionary (10th edition), a “hate   …Continue Reading Hate Crime Law in Massachusetts