Post Content

Yesterday, the N.F.L. prevailed in their appeal in the deflategate case. The 2-1 decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in National Football League Management Council and National Football League v. National Football League Players Association and Tom Brady includes a dissent by Chief Judge Robert A. Katzmann.

An article in the New York Times about the decision, “N.F.L. Wins Appeal, and Tom Brady Has Little Recourse” holds out little hope for a reversal of the Court of Appeals’ decision: “The panel’s decision can be appealed to the full Second Circuit, or even the Supreme Court…”

Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure allow for En Banc Determination. The Rule states “a majority of the circuit judges who are in regular active service and who are not disqualified may order that an appeal or other proceeding be heard or reheard by the court of appeals en banc. An en banc hearing or rehearing is not favored and ordinarily will not be ordered unless:(1) en banc consideration is necessary to secure or maintain uniformity of the court’s decisions; or(2) the proceeding involves a question of exceptional importance.”

The United States Supreme Court would need a compelling reason to review the Federal Court of Appeals decision. Review is “not a matter of right, but of judicial discretion.” Roger Groves of Forbes magazine has made an argument “Why Tom Brady Should Appeal To The United States Supreme Court.”

Written By:

Tags: , , ,

Recent Posts

Index to blog post series about codification posted on Sep 27

In order to help navigating in and around our series about codification that was posted during the last two weeks, the following index may help: Word(s) of the month – codification, posted September 16, 2019, from Black’s Law Dictionary, 10th ed., Bryan A. Garner, Editor in Chief,   …Continue Reading Index to blog post series about codification

Codification of Federal Law Today posted on Sep 26

“The United States Code is prepared and published by the Office of the Law Revision Counsel (“OLRC”) of the U.S. House of Representatives pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 285b. The Code contains the general and permanent laws of the United States, organized into titles based on subject matter.   …Continue Reading Codification of Federal Law Today

Historical Codifications of Federal Law posted on Sep 25

“For some inexplicable reason, the early publications of the laws of the United States have not captured the attention of legal bibliographers as have the state session laws. If one may judge by the scarcity of commercial publications, it would seem that the federal laws   …Continue Reading Historical Codifications of Federal Law