Post Content

A recent case from the Appeals Court takes on the issues involved in a removal case.  When a parent requests permission to move out of state, the court must determine the real advantage to the moving parent and balance it against the best interests of the child and the other parent.  In Murray v. Super the courts reviewed the components, also including the interests of both parents.  In this case, the children has significant relationships with the father, spending about one third of the year with him.

The court also addressed the difficult issue of support received by the mother by her husband, and whether it should count as income for the child support guidelines.

 “…The Masschusetts Child Support Guidelines (2009) (guidelines) detail the types of income that can be considered in calculating child support. See guidelines § I-A. The father contends that the funds received by the mother from her husband are specifically contemplated by the guidelines, which provide that income may include “[s]pousal support from a person not a party to this order.” Guidelines § I-A(18) Alternatively, the father argues that the income falls under the catch-all provision, covering “[a]ny other form of income or compensation not specifically itemized above.” Guidelines § I-A(28). The mother contends that the guidelines prohibit from consideration contributions of a present spouse in calculating a child support obligation. Contrary to the position of each party, the guidelines do not reflect a direct prohibition on contributions from a present spouse, nor do they include a direct command to include them. Rather, “[t]he guidelines and our case law leave the definition of income flexible, and the judge’s discretion in its determination broad.” Casey v. Casey, 79 Mass. App. Ct. 623, 634 (2011). Nevertheless, that discretion is not without bounds…”

That issue is not one we can provide a black and white answer to, although it is asked many times.

Written By:

Tags: , , ,

Recent Posts

Accessing the Codification of Massachusetts law in print and online posted on Sep 19

In the blog post “Codification of Massachusetts law today”, reference is made to the chapter on “Statutes and Session Laws” in Handbook of Legal Research in Massachusetts, which says “The official edition of the General Laws has been published in paperbound format since 1984.” The only official version   …Continue Reading Accessing the Codification of Massachusetts law in print and online

Codification of Massachusetts Law Today posted on Sep 18

Codification of Massachusetts Law Today

To follow up on yesterday’s blog post, “Historical Codifications of Massachusetts Law”, recodifying the law every twenty years or so became a burdensome process. “Before 1921, few, if any of the Acts and Resolves passed during a legislative session were written to mesh with the   …Continue Reading Codification of Massachusetts Law Today

Historical Codifications of Massachusetts Law posted on Sep 17

Following up on yesterday’s blog post, “Word(s) of the Month – codification“, we can take a look at historical codifications of Massachusetts law. “The earliest codification of laws in Massachusetts was the 1649 codification, the Book of the General Lawes and Libertyes, which incorporated the   …Continue Reading Historical Codifications of Massachusetts Law