Post Content

Written by James Crowley, Esq., Bureau of Municipal Finance Law

 

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit ruled against a company which supplied road salt to the City of Boston in the winter of 2004-2005 and then disputed with the City over the amount owed for the deliveries. The decision is International Salt Company, LLC v. City of Boston, (1st Circuit. Mass., December 18, 2009).

 

In August 2004 the City of Boston sought bids for 75,000 tons of road salt for the upcoming winter season. The City accepted the bid of International Salt Company, LLC (ISCO) and a contract was executed. Under the terms of the contract, ISCO agreed to supply 75,000 tons of road salt at $36.42 per ton for a total price of $2.7 million. In October 2004 the City Auditor certified the appropriation of funds. A week later the Mayor approved the contract in writing.

 

ISCO delivered about 71,000 tons of road salt to the City by February 2005 at the agreed price of $36.42 per ton. It was a very snowy winter, however, and the City officials demanded additional deliveries through the end of the contract term on June 30, 2005 so as to ensure public safety. ISCO contended that it was obligated to supply only 75,000 tons at $36.42 per ton. The company informed the City that shipping costs had risen sharply and any deliveries in excess of 75,000 tons would have to be paid for at a price to be negotiated or later determined by a court. Under protest, ISCO delivered an additional 27,000 tons in excess of the 75,000 ton contract figure. Although ISCO wanted a price increase for the 27,000 additional tons of road salt, the City paid the vendor at the $36.42 contract rate. ISCO attempted to negotiate with the City and argued that the City by placing orders in excess of the contractually established 75,000 ton figure had implicitly agreed to pay the fair market price for the extra deliveries. ISCO’s position was that the City should be expected to pay the market rate of $56.37 per ton instead of the contract price of $36.42 per ton. Consequently, ISCO asserted that the City of Boston should pay $1.5 million for the additional 27,000 tons instead of the $984,000 amount as calculated by the City.

 

Click here to read more …

Written By:

Recent Posts

MassTaxConnect powers into new year with more speed and precision posted on Dec 21

MassTaxConnect powers into new year with more speed and precision

You know where you’re going. With a few new add-ons, we made it easier to get there. Same road, better ride This January, we hope your 2021 gets off to a smooth start with our enhanced, high performance tax platform. Changes to MassTaxConnect are subtle,   …Continue Reading MassTaxConnect powers into new year with more speed and precision

It’s a new holiday season but some things haven’t changed posted on Dec 11

Scams are rampant but you can protect yourself We are not alone in trying to keep you safe. The IRS and other states are working hard to come up with ways to stop the scammers who never take a holiday. We’ve pulled some of the   …Continue Reading It’s a new holiday season but some things haven’t changed

On the road (virtually) with DOR posted on Nov 9

Every fall and winter, we hit the road to talk with community members and tax professionals about the upcoming tax filing season and other need-to-know DOR updates. Of course, like many things this year, we had to rethink what “on the road” would look like   …Continue Reading On the road (virtually) with DOR