Post Content

Bliss for Blog IMG_9679_resized

Posted by:

Robert Bliss, Director of Communication, Department of Revenue

DOR has received several inquiries lately from buyers of new I-Phones asking why the sales tax charged on the price of the phone reflected a substantially higher purchase price than the actual price paid.

For example, a buyer paid $300 for the phone but was charged sales tax as if the phone's real price was $699. How can this be is not an unreasonable question.

Welcome to the world of bundled and unbundled cell phone transactions. Time for a little deconstruction.

The underlying issue here is that some cell phone companies bundle the cost of the new phone with a service contract. This is called a bundled transaction in which real cost of the phone is in effect subsidized by the purchase of the service contract. At the dawn of the era of cell phones, DOR in 1993 issued Directive 93-9 which basically states that in a bundled transaction, the real price of the phone for purpose of calculating sales tax is the price that would have been paid for the same phone in an unbundled sale without a service contract.

More recently, DOR's resident expert on this subject phrased it this way: "In simplest terms, a vendor selling a phone in a transaction where a purchaser is also required to sign a service contract with a telecommunications provider is receiving consideration both from the purchaser and a substantial commission from the telecommunications provider. Because the actual amount of the commission is considered proprietary information between the vendor and the telecom provider, DOR approximates the 'true' consideration for the sale of the phone by requiring tax to be collected on the 'unbundled' advertised price."

By way of further clarification, last year DOR issued in March Letter Ruling 09-2 in response to a request from a cell phone manufacturer. Since letter rulings are issued to individual taxpayers, the name of the company and any information that might identify it is stripped out of the letter ruling, but the discussion is there for all to see. Also, the letter ruling refers to a sales tax of 5 percent, which later last year was increased to 6.25 percent.

So, as in any sales transaction, shop around and compare prices to get the best deal, and to get the lowest possible sales tax.

Written By:

Recent Posts

DOR + Social Media — #CheckUsOut posted on Jul 28

DOR + Social Media — #CheckUsOut

  State tax administration might not deliver such seismic news events as LeBron’s eagerly-awaited announcement of his return to his old Cleveland team, but knowing what’s going on at any given moment in the tax world could save you some time and effort, and maybe   …Continue Reading DOR + Social Media — #CheckUsOut

Commute to work on the T, Commuter Rail or Turnpike? You may be eligible for a Massachusetts Commuter Deduction on your tax return! posted on Jul 16

Commute to work on the T, Commuter Rail or Turnpike?  You may be eligible for a Massachusetts Commuter Deduction on your tax return!

The Commuter Deduction was enacted by the Legislature to cover specific commuter expenses. To help understand the deduction,  the Department of Revenue’s DOR University has released an e-learning module explaining what qualifies for a deduction, real-life examples and how you can claim your commuter deduction   …Continue Reading Commute to work on the T, Commuter Rail or Turnpike? You may be eligible for a Massachusetts Commuter Deduction on your tax return!

DOR Offers FREE E-Learning Course on Fraternal Organization Tax Responsibilities posted on Jul 9

Help get the word out! The Department of Revenue’s online DOR University has recently developed a new free e-learning course on the tax responsibilities of fraternal organizations. Fraternal organizations are considered a type of Chapter 180 Corporation, which are formed for charitable or other purposes.   …Continue Reading DOR Offers FREE E-Learning Course on Fraternal Organization Tax Responsibilities