Post Content

In a recent Appeals Court unreported decision, Joseph v. Nathanson, the appeals court has given us a broader definition of “destroyed” or cutting down.

The statute is Mass. General Law chapter 242 sec. 7, which reads : “A person who without license willfully cuts down, carries away, girdles or otherwise destroys trees, timber, wood or underwood on the land of another shall be liable to the owner in tort for three times the amount of the damages assessed therefor; but if it is found that the defendant had good reason to believe that the land on which the trespass was committed was his own or that he was otherwise lawfully authorized to do the acts complained of, he shall be liable for single damages only.”

The defendant removed between 5 to 6 feet from the top of the arbor vitae trees which were planted on the plaintiff’s property, near the property line as a privacy screen.  The court found that “”otherwise destroyed” includes, but is not limited to, the preceding phrases including ‘cut down.’ ”  The expert witness testified that the trees would never grow vertically again, and would not function as a privacy screen.

The plaintiff was awarded $35,000 in damages which were trebled under the statute.

Written By:

Tags: ,

Recent Posts

Index to blog post series about standing posted on Oct 22

In order to help navigating in and around our series about standing that was posted during the last two weeks, the following index may help: Words(s) of the month – standing posted October 16, 2019, from Black’s Law Dictionary, 11th ed., Bryan A. Garner, Editor   …Continue Reading Index to blog post series about standing

Do Ecosystems Have Standing?  posted on Oct 21

  Ecosystems, such as lakes, valleys, and forests, are treated by the courts, for the most part, in the same way that animals or species are, when it comes to legal standing to sue. (See our recent posts: Do Animals Have Standing? parts 1 & 2)    …Continue Reading Do Ecosystems Have Standing? 

Do Animals Have Standing to Sue? Part 2: Animals filing as individuals posted on Oct 20

Do Animals Have Standing to Sue?  Part 2: Animals filing as individuals

  A dolphin walked up to the bar in Massachusetts, but was told it had no standing. Well, at least legally. A male dolphin named Kama was named as a plaintiff in a case in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts   …Continue Reading Do Animals Have Standing to Sue? Part 2: Animals filing as individuals